Love, Death, and Poly-Something
I have 78 year old neighbor, widower,
who sits in her house alone most the time, waiting to die. I check on her. We
share food. We talk. I listen to the stories she has told perhaps a hundred
times as if I have heard them for the first time. She has family. We all do.
They’re distant, they’re busy, or, as in the case with mine- they’re too
bat-shit crazy to spend time with. My neighbor doesn’t want a roommate. She
doesn’t want a new ‘fella.’ The few friends she has have suggested these things,
some even telling her to get over ‘death,’ move on, and nothing makes her
madder than hearing that. He was her high school sweet heart and they were
together 62 years. “You don’t just get over that.” I don’t spend our time
trying to persuade her. She is not suicidal. She simply exists, remembering her
life with a man that is now gone.
Many of my own family have lived equally
isolated lives. The statistics are quite clear, more and more people live alone,
especially the elderly. We are isolated. We are experiencing epic rates of
depression and anxiety. We’re more connected today than in any time in the
history of people, thanks to media and cellphones, and yet, more lonely, more
anxious, more untrusting of the motives of others, and more likely to be
focused on maintaining our level of comfort than building relationships. If we’re
parents, we’re more likely to be a single parent, raising kids alone with little
family help if we have family help at all. Children or not, we’re less likely
to stick together as couples than any previous generation. We don’t celebrate
longevity of relationships, whether that’s people, or careers. The days of gold
watches are over. We’re encouraged to leave and move on, sold the idea it’s
better for us. It certainly better for the companies that keep wages low with
high turnover rates. But consider, at least in terms of personal relationships,
how many of us have actually stuck through some tough stuff to discover there
is a better quality of relationship on the other side of storms? If we have
family and friends- they’ll be in our ears telling us to move on, we can do
better. ‘Life’s too short to put up with that.’ ‘Plenty of fish in the sea.’ And
that’s technically true. There are enough single people on apps that every one
of us has the potential of being traded out for an upgrade. There is always
better. It’s also the explanation for why so many people fail to commit to long
term relationships; there is always the potential of an ideal partner just a
swipe away.
When I was young, I was full of the
romantic notions instilled by Hollywood, Disney, and Fairy Tales of having that
one partner for life. Part of me also wanted that because my own family life
was so unstable that I felt like I needed someone that always be there.
Unfortunately, the drama I lived through also became my inheritance. It took a
while for me to grow up. I own that. With each next relationship, I fell
further and further from ‘the ideal’ of one for life; but I became a better
person, a better partner, a better lover. For the longest time I even feared
hell because that’s what the Church of Christ assured me. My maternal
grandfather was 70 something, having been married and divorced three times, a
deacon in the CoC, and telling me and my first wife not to ever divorce; “I don’t
want you to spend eternity in hell with me.” Serial monogamy is what it’s
called today. The definition of monogamy has become one partner at a time.
We’ve changed. Our communities have
changed. The way we relate to each other has changed. What we’re doing doesn’t
seem to be working. We get together, we fight, we break up. Most people are not
bad people, but there is a real thing here: people will vilify a partner in
order to justify the departure. We have to have a rationalization in order to
blow things up, so that family and friends can be rallied into our alliance. We
forget that children will love both parents and that they become collateral damage
in these fights. Regardless of which parent they go with, they then see a
string of dating relationships. We are now teaching impermanence in
relationships. Statistics are very clear on this part: children are more likely
to be physically and sexually abused by the new person than the bio-parents.
It seems to me, the most loving act a
person can do for a partner is to help them cultivate relationships from the
start of a relationship. Assume you’re in a loving relationship. Assume it’s a
good relationships, one that will last until one of you dies. Would a loving
partner want your dating life to be random? People on apps aren’t always
honest. They have issues. They’re not necessarily financially secure. They don’t
always have a person’s best interest in heart. Some people believe love is
keeping someone, like property- and will break slowly break the ties of your
present friends and family, subtly. One day you just wake up and everyone you
know is gone or alienated because they don’t like the new guy. If there are
children, sometimes the children are seen as a threat, or a serious distraction
that keeps a partner from being able to spend ‘quality’ time with them.
Competition ensues. Some people simply just don’t like someone else’s children.
Wouldn’t it have been nice to have solved all of this up front, with both
lovers taking serious interest in the quality of the friendships being built
around them?
Not everyone is cut out for the hippy
life style. Not everyone is cut out to be poly. It take some serious courage to
push through the social artifacts in our paradigm that suggest monogamy is the
only healthy way of being. We have to face our own insecurities and our own
lusts. We have to face the fact that we have preferences and we are not truly
wired to provide true equality, or perhaps equanimity, to the people we love
and serve. We have dropped ‘service’ from our ideas of love. And what I am
arguing for isn’t necessarily polygamy, or rationalization for as many sex
partners as a couple can tolerate. I am arguing for a community. In the old-old
days, we had the tribe. We shared everything. There were no secrets. If someone
beat up on his partner, the tribe stepped in and put a stop to that shit.
Children belonged to the tribe. Everyone shared in food and water. In the old
days, we had a village, or a church. We helped each other. Now, we’re own our
own. We judge people by their level of individuation. If you are living with
someone, a parent, a sibling, or renting a room- you have failed. There are
people, single parents and kids sleeping in cars because the stigma of going
home is too great, and because the parent’s parents don’t want the kids and the
grandkids- they too expect their kids to make it.
Here’s an idea. In addition to you and
your partner cultivating friends, you make a plan to bring a community up in financial
security. This has to be quality friends, the kind of friends you would call
family. This new unit focuses on immediate solvency- such paying off one house,
maybe even living together. On accomplishing this, everyone focuses on helping
the friends reach the same level of solvency. Or, you go to the next door neighbor
and you tell your neighbor, “We want to help you pay off your house. We will do
this, but the caveat is, when we’re done, you help us pay off the next neighbor’s
house.” Your street now builds towards permanence and solvency. A stability is
establish. This is, ideally, what churches should be doing for their congregation.
The Church building should be the most God-awful, small, ugly building ever-
because everyone in the congregation is working on the whole congregation being
solvent. Church buildings come and go. Communities don’t. When every member has
a house that is paid off, the congregation now has access to greater ability to
serve the community. Church was supposed to be about service, not spreading the
word. People learned the word because they saw the fruits of a stable
community.
I am not arguing for Christianity or any
one religion. If you made pick one, I would pick Buddhism. I am arguing for
loving, connected communities. Garden shares, hippy houses, communes, Kibbutz-
these are the kinds of communities we should be building, not gated
communities. We should be working towards having our homes off the grid, either
solar or wind, and selling our excess energy back to the state, and the excess
energy should be running desalination plants to take back some of the rising
water from global warming. We need places where people are safe to love, share
time, share food, share gardens, and look after each other from birth to death.
Few people want to die alone in a nursing home. Hell, go visit a nursing home
and tell me you want you to sign up for that! Urinating in your bed because
there is not enough staff to answer your call light. Or people making you eat
faster than you can swallow because they have a schedule.
Sign me up for community, a people who
care and look after one another. They care about the homes and the land the
homes reside on. Sign me up for love. Hold the kind of love for me that you
would not leave me searching a world of crazy for something sane and stable. I
would do this for you. Love does not seek to isolate. We are healthiest in
communities because we are social. Being kind, sharing, and serving has always
been the attributes of love.
Comments
Post a Comment